Radical Cystectomy: Open vs Robotic Approach

Abstract

No AccessJournal of UrologyOpposing Views1 Feb 2015Radical Cystectomy: Open vs Robotic Approach Clayton Stephen Lau, Robert H. Blackwell, and Marcus L. Quek Clayton Stephen LauClayton Stephen Lau More articles by this author , Robert H. BlackwellRobert H. Blackwell More articles by this author , and Marcus L. QuekMarcus L. Quek More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.11.079AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail References 1 : Propensity-matched comparison of morbidity and costs of open and robotic assisted radical cystectomies: a contemporary population based analysis in the United States. Eur Urol2014; 66: 569. Google Scholar 2 : A randomized trial of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. N Engl J Med2014; 371: 389. Google Scholar 3 : Lymphadenectomy at the time of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. BJU Int2011; 107: 642. Google Scholar 4 : Quality of lympadenectomy is equivalent in robotic and open cystectomy using the same template. J Urol2012; 187: 1200. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Complications after robotic assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol2013; 64: 52. Google Scholar 6 : Defining morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol2009; 5: 164. Google Scholar 7 : Early and late complications of robotic assisted cystectomy: a standardized analysis by urinary diversion type. J Urol2014; 191: 681. Link, Google Scholar 8 : Intermediate-term oncologic outcomes of robotic assisted radical cystectomy for urothelial cancer. J Endourol2014; 28: 939. Google Scholar 9 : The RAZOR trial — randomized open versus robotic cystectomy — study design and trial update. BJU Int2014; . Epub ahead of print. Google Scholar 10 : Assessing the minimum number of lymph nodes needed at radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. BJU Int2009; 103: 1359. Google Scholar 11 : Impact of surgeon and volume on extended lymphadenectomy at the time of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium (IRCC). BJU Int2013; 111: 1075. Google Scholar 12 : Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol2010; 57: 196. Google Scholar 13 : Perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy. J Urol2013; 189: 474. Link, Google Scholar 14 : Lymphadenectomy with robotic cystectomy. Curr Urol Rep2013; 14: 59. Google Scholar 15 : Positive surgical margins in soft tissue following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and cancer specific survival. J Urol2007; 178: 2308. Link, Google Scholar 16 : A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy. Eur Urol2010; 57: 274. Google Scholar 17 : Surgical margin status after robot assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol2010; 184: 87. Link, Google Scholar 18 : Matched comparison of robotic-assisted and open radical cystectomy. Urology2012; 79: 1303. Google Scholar © 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 193Issue 2February 2015Page: 400-402 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Clayton Stephen Lau More articles by this author Robert H. Blackwell More articles by this author Marcus L. Quek More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...