Abstract

BackgroundSpine metastasis is a common occurrence in cancer patients and results in pain, neurologic deficits, decline in performance status, disability, inferior quality of life (QOL), and reduction in ability to receive cancer-directed therapies. Conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is associated with modest rates of pain relief, high rates of disease recurrence, low response rates for those with radioresistant histologies, and limited improvement in neurologic deficits. The addition of radiofrequency ablation/percutaneous vertebral augmentation (RFA/PVA) to index sites together with EBRT may improve pain response rates and corresponding quality of life.Methods/designThis is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial in patients with spine metastasis from T5-L5, stratified according to tumor type (radioresistant vs. radiosensitive) in which patients in each stratum will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either RFA/PVA and EBRT or EBRT alone. All patients will be treated with EBRT to a dose of 20–30 Gy in 5–10 fractions. The target parameters will be measured and recorded at the baseline clinic visit, and daily at home with collection of weekly measurements at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after treatment, and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months following treatment with imaging and QOL assessments.DiscussionThe primary objective of this randomized trial is to determine whether RFA/PVA in addition to EBRT improves pain control compared to palliative EBRT alone for patients with spine metastasis, defined as complete or partial pain relief (measured using the Numerical Rating Pain Scale [NRPS]) at 3 months. Secondary objectives include determining whether combined modality treatment improves the rapidity of pain response, duration of pain response, patient reported pain impact, health utility, and overall QOL.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04375891. Registered on 5 May 2020.

Highlights

  • Spine metastasis is a common occurrence in cancer patients and results in pain, neurologic deficits, decline in performance status, disability, inferior quality of life (QOL), and reduction in ability to receive cancerdirected therapies

  • The primary objective of this randomized trial is to determine whether radiofrequency ablation/percutaneous vertebral augmentation (RFA/PVA) in addition to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) improves pain control compared to palliative EBRT alone for patients with spine metastasis, defined as complete or partial pain relief at 3 months

  • Spine metastasis is a common occurrence in patients with metastatic disease and results in pain, neurologic deficits, decline in performance status, disability, inferior quality of life, and reduction in ability to receive cancer-directed therapies

Read more

Summary

Discussion

Spine metastasis is a common occurrence in patients with metastatic disease and results in pain, neurologic deficits, decline in performance status, disability, inferior quality of life, and reduction in ability to receive cancer-directed therapies. There have been more than 20 randomized controlled trials, 32 prospective non-randomized studies, and 4 metaanalyses/pooled analyses regarding the role of palliative EBRT for patients with bone metastasis [15]. Despite this wealth of research, there are clear limitations to conventional EBRT, including modest rates of pain relief [3], high rates of disease recurrence [16], very low response rates for patients with various histologies (including sarcoma, melanoma, gastrointestinal, non-small cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma) [17], and limited benefit in neurologic deficit improvement [17]. Mehta: Consulting for Karyopharm, Tocagen, Astra-Zeneca, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Celgene, Abbvie; Board of Directors: Oncoceutics

Background
Findings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call