Abstract
Background: Recent advances in technology have had a significant impact on the electrophysiology-based treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Main areas of impact involve radiation risk and procedure time. We evaluate use of cryo-ablations compared to conventional radiofrequency (RF) ablation procedures. Methods: Details for 292 consecutive patients undergoing index AF ablation were captured into a single-centre registry. Radiation, procedural and outcome data for three ablation techniques were compared: RF ablation with (30) and without (59) the anti-scatter grid (RF Grid and RF Gridless) and cryoballoon ablation (203) utilising the first and second generation Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoons (Cryo). The dose area product (DAP; Gy cm2) was adjusted for a standardised patient weight of 80 kg. Results/Discussion: DAP was significantly higher for RF Grid (7.31) than the Cryo (2.09) and RF Gridless groups (3.11). DAP for Cryo was significantly lower than RF Gridless (p < 0.001). Similarly, fluoroscopy time (FT) was significantly different between Cryo and RF Gridless cohorts (13.1 vs. 16.8 min; p < 0.001) as were the procedure times (85 min vs. 146 min; p < 0.001), respectively. There was no significant difference in procedural outcome and complication rates between the three approaches. Conclusion: Cryoballoon technology offers a viable means of significantly improving the efficiency of index AF ablations. Significant reductions in radiation exposure and procedure time while maintaining safety and efficacy were achieved.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have