Abstract
We compared the effective dose (E) and thyroid equivalent dose of 2 extraoral bitewing (EOBW) units and compared E with their respective panoramic (PAN) modes and with intraoral bitewing radiography (IOBW). Child and adult anthropomorphic phantoms with dosimeters were used to evaluate Orthophos SL, Rayscan α+, and 1 intraoral unit using rectangular and circular collimation. Extraoral bitewing thyroid equivalent dose was assessed without and with thyroid shielding. Child and adult E values of EOBW were lower with Orthophos (3.6 and 8.6 μSv) than with Rayscan (28.1 and 30.2 μSv). For IOBW, E was lower with rectangular vs circular collimation for child (7.0 vs 11.8 μSv) and adult (4.6 vs 14.2 μSv). E values of EOBW were lower than PAN for Orthophos. The IOBW E was lower than Rayscan EOBW for child (≤11.8 vs 28.1 μSv) and adult (≤14.2 vs 30.2 μSv). Adult E for rectangular IOBW (4.6 μSv) was lower than EOBW with Orthophos (8.6 μSv) and Rayscan (30.2 μSv). Thyroid shielding reduced EOBW thyroid equivalent dose with Rayscan in the adult from 190.7 to 89.0 μSv. Orthophos provides significantly lower EOBW E than Rayscan, thus EOBW recommendations must be unit specific. For children, Orthophos EOBW could be an alternative to IOBW, for which rectangular collimation is recommended. Thyroid shielding reduced adult Rayscan equivalent dose but added imaging artifacts.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
