Radiation dose and image conspicuity comparison between conventional 120 kVp and 150 kVp with spectral beam shaping for temporal bone CT

Abstract

ObjectiveThe purpose of this article is to compare radiation doses and conspicuity of anatomic landmarks of the temporal bone between the CT technique using spectral beam shaping at 150 kVp with a dedicated tin filter (150 kVp-Sn) and the conventional protocol at 120 kVp. Methods25 patients (mean age, 46.8 ± 21.2 years) were examined using the 150-kVp Sn protocol (200 reference mAs using automated tube current modulation, 64 × 0.6 mm collimation, 0.6 mm slice thickness, pitch 0.8), whereas 30 patients (mean age, 54.5 ± 17.8 years) underwent the 120-kVp protocol (180 mAs, 128 × 0.6 mm collimation, 0.6 mm slice thickness, pitch 0.8). Radiation doses were compared between the two acquisition techniques, and dosimetric data from the literature were reviewed for comparison of radiation dose reduction. Subjective conspicuity of 23 anatomic landmarks of the temporal bone, expressed by 5-point rating scale and objective conspicuity by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) which measured in 4 different regions of interest (ROI), were compared between 150-kVp Sn and 120-kVp acquisitions. ResultsThe mean dose-length-product (DLP) and effective dose were significantly lower for the 150-kVp Sn scans (0.26 ± 0.26 mSv) compared with the 120-kVp scans (0.92 ± 0.10 mSv, p < 0.001). The lowest effective dose from the literature-based protocols was 0.31 ± 0.12 mSv, which proposed as a low-dose protocol in the setting of spiral multislice temporal bone CT. SNR was slightly superior for 120-kVp images, however analyzability of the 23 anatomic structures did not differ significantly between 150-kVp Sn and 120-kVp scans. ConclusionTemporal bone CT performed at 150 kVp with an additional tin filter for spectral shaping markedly reduced radiation exposure when compared with conventional temporal bone CT at 120 kVp while maintaining anatomic conspicuity. The decreased radiation dose of the 150-kVp Sn was also lower in comparison to the previous literature-based low-dose temporal bone CT protocol.