Abstract

Introduction: The posterior interosseous artery flap (PIAF) has been used for many years for a successful coverage of the defects of dorsal aspect of the hand. Recently a concern was raised regarding donor site morbidity, as skin grafting has poor functional and aesthetic outcomes. We present a case report with an alternative technique for the donor site closure with radial artery perforator propeller flap. So far, we have used this technique in 4 cases. Case report: A 50 years old male was hospitalized due to a crush injury to the right hand. Examination revealed fractures of 4th and 5th metacarpal bone, crashed intrinsic muscles, rupture of extensor tendons and 5x7 centimeters soft tissue defect. Bone fixation was done, tendons were sutured primarily. For the hand’s soft tissue defect a PIAF was used. To cover the defect on the donor site and to avoid skin grafting a perforator propeller flap was raised. The flap was based on a single perforator from the radial artery. No healing problems occurred. Conclusions: Perforator based on radial artery at dorsoradial aspect of forearm, could be used as propeller flap for soft tissue covering after PIAF. By covering the donor site with a perforator flap skin grafting is avoided, faster healing, good skin color and texture match is achieved.

Highlights

  • The posterior interosseous artery flap (PIAF) has been used for many years for a successful coverage of the defects of dorsal aspect of the hand

  • High-energy trauma can result in fractures, tendon and soft tissue defects [1]

  • If it is necessary to cover large defects, donor site can’t be closed primarily and usually skin grafts are used, which has poor aesthetic results and longer healing. In this case report we present an alternative technique for the closure of the PIAF donor site with perforator propeller flap

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Crush injuries of the hand is a frequent problem in emergency reconstructive microsurgery. If it is necessary to cover large defects, donor site can’t be closed primarily and usually skin grafts are used, which has poor aesthetic results and longer healing. In this case report we present an alternative technique for the closure of the PIAF donor site with perforator propeller flap. Anatomical studies have shown that the radial artery gives appropriate perforators in the proximal part of the forearm Authors describe their usage for covering defects on the elbow, but no other authors report raising these flaps for covering other flaps’ donor sites [11, 12]. Further anatomical studies should be carried out to investigate perforator precise landmarks

Conclusion
Conflict of interest statement
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call