Abstract

Simple SummaryIn the BRIDGES project, the breast/ovarian cancer gene RAD51D has been sequenced in >113,000 women. In the present study, we focused on the impact that 11 pre-selected RAD51D variants at the intron/exon boundaries had on the splicing process (intron removal). For this purpose, we developed a splicing reporter minigene, containing RAD51D-exons 2–9 wherein any variant could be introduced and functionally assayed for splicing alterations. All variants impaired splicing, 10 of which caused complete splicing aberrations. Moreover, we developed a minigene-based strategy to search for non-canonical, spliceogenic variants that disrupted splicing enhancers/silencers in the non-constitutive exon 3. Twenty-six BRIDGES and 16 artificial exon 3 variants were also tested. Thirty variants impaired splicing by producing variable amounts of the FL transcript. In total, up to 9 variants were classified as Likely Pathogenic, and therefore were clinically actionable. Carriers may benefit from tailored prevention protocols and therapies.RAD51D loss-of-function variants increase lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Splicing disruption is a frequent pathogenic mechanism associated with variants in susceptibility genes. Herein, we have assessed the splicing and clinical impact of splice-site and exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) variants identified through the study of ~113,000 women of the BRIDGES cohort. A RAD51D minigene with exons 2–9 was constructed in splicing vector pSAD. Eleven BRIDGES splice-site variants (selected by MaxEntScan) were introduced into the minigene by site-directed mutagenesis and tested in MCF-7 cells. The 11 variants disrupted splicing, collectively generating 25 different aberrant transcripts. All variants but one produced negligible levels (<3.4%) of the full-length (FL) transcript. In addition, ESE elements of the alternative exon 3 were mapped by testing four overlapping exonic microdeletions (≥30-bp), revealing an ESE-rich interval (c.202_235del) with critical sequences for exon 3 recognition that might have been affected by germline variants. Next, 26 BRIDGES variants and 16 artificial exon 3 single-nucleotide substitutions were also assayed. Thirty variants impaired splicing with variable amounts (0–65.1%) of the FL transcript, although only c.202G>A demonstrated a complete aberrant splicing pattern without the FL transcript. On the other hand, c.214T>C increased efficiency of exon 3 recognition, so only the FL transcript was detected (100%). In conclusion, 41 RAD51D spliceogenic variants (28 of which were from the BRIDGES cohort) were identified by minigene assays. We show that minigene-based mapping of ESEs is a powerful approach for identifying ESE hotspots and ESE-disrupting variants. Finally, we have classified nine variants as likely pathogenic according to ACMG/AMP-based guidelines, highlighting the complex relationship between splicing alterations and variant interpretation.

Highlights

  • RAD51D [MIM#602954] is one of the five RAD51 paralogs (RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2, XRCC3) that play an important role in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks via homologous recombination [1,2]

  • A RAD51D minigene with exons 2–9 was constructed in splicing vector pSAD

  • Summarizing, we evaluated a total of 42 candidate exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) variants (26 identified in BRIDGES subjects), 30 of which impaired RAD51D exon 3 splicing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

RAD51D [MIM#602954] is one of the five RAD51 paralogs (RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2, XRCC3) that play an important role in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks via homologous recombination [1,2]. RAD51D loss-of-function variants confer risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer [3,4]. In a cohort of 6690 families, RAD51D pathogenic variants were associated with relative risks of 7.6 and 1.83 for tubo-ovarian cancer and breast cancer, respectively [3]. Two large-scale studies have estimated an overall breast cancer relative risk of 1.8 and 1.72, respectively [5,6]. During RNA splicing, introns from eukaryotic genes are removed from pre-mRNA, and consecutive exons are precisely joined together to form mature mRNA [7]. It has been proposed that ~60% of disease-causing variants disrupt pre-mRNA processing [9], generating aberrant transcripts that can affect protein function and correlate with an increased risk of a given genetic disease. The lack of accurate in silico predictors makes functional assays vital to doing so

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call