Abstract

Racial disparities in cancer mortality still exist despite improvements in treatment strategies leading to improved survival for many cancer types. In this study, we described race/ethnic differences in patterns of de novo metastasis and evaluated the association between site of de novo metastasis and breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer mortality. Data were obtained from the Surveillance Epidemiology and Ends Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2013 and included 520,147 patients ages ≥40 years with primary diagnosis of breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer. Site and frequency of de novo metastases to four sites (bone, brain, liver, and lung) were compared by race/ethnicity using descriptive statistics, and survival differences examined using extended Cox regression models in SAS 9.4. Overall, non‐Hispanic (NH) Blacks (11%) were more likely to present with de novo metastasis compared with NH‐Whites (9%) or Hispanics (10%). Among patients with breast cancer, NH‐Blacks were more likely to have metastasis to the bone, (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.15–1.37), brain (OR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.57–3.25), or liver (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.35–1.93), while Hispanics were less likely to have metastasis to the liver (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60–0.97) compared with NH‐Whites. Among patients with prostate cancer, NH‐Blacks (1.39, 95% CI: 1.31–1.48) and Hispanics (1.39, 95% CI: 1.29–1.49) were more likely to have metastasis to the bone. Metastasis to any of the four sites evaluated increased overall mortality by threefold (for breast cancer and metastasis to bone) to 17‐fold (for prostate cancer and metastasis to liver). Racial disparities in mortality remained after adjusting for metastasis site in all cancer types evaluated. De novo metastasis is a major contributor to cancer mortality in USA with racial differences in the site, frequency, and associated survival.

Highlights

  • Important advancements in the molecular characterization and treatment strategies for the major cancer types have led to significant improvements in survival, with 5-y­ear relative survival at 99% for prostate cancer, 89% for breast cancer, and 65% for colorectal cancer in 2016 [1]

  • Similar patterns were observed for other primary cancer sites and strikingly, among patients with prostate cancer, de novo metastasis to the liver was associated with a 17-f­old increased hazard of cancer mortality (HR: 17.12, 95% CI: 13.29–22.06)

  • In the large population-b­ased Surveillance Epidemiology and Ends Results (SEER) cancer registry, the site and number of de novo metastasis appeared to vary by race/ethnicity among patients with a primary diagnosis of breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer, with 11% non-H­ ispanic (NH)-­ Blacks, 9% NH-W­ hites, and 10% Hispanics diagnosed with de novo metastasis to at least one distant site in the body

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Important advancements in the molecular characterization and treatment strategies for the major cancer types have led to significant improvements in survival, with 5-y­ear relative survival at 99% for prostate cancer, 89% for breast cancer, and 65% for colorectal cancer in 2016 [1]. By identifying race-­specific patterns of de novo metastasis, especially for highly prevalent cancer types with documented survival disparities, interventions to increase postdiagnosis surveillance and tailored screening strategies may help to prevent distant metastasis, thereby improving the efficacy of primary treatment and increasing survival. In this analysis, we examine the patterns of de novo metastasis for breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer among non-­Hispanic Whites, non-­Hispanic Blacks, and Hispanics represented in the population-b­ased Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database

Methods
Results
Discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.