Abstract
In this rejoinder I address Lublin and Voss's theoretical and empirical critique (in this issue) of my analysis of racial redistricting. I first show that their theoretical critique simply consists of unsubstantiated assertions. Moreover, Lublin and Voss fail to recognize that their unproven assertions are directly contradicted by previously published theoretical analysis. I then turn to Lublin and Voss's empirical critique and demonstrate that the research design underlying their claims is fundamentally flawed. Thus, Lublin and Voss provide no compelling reason to question my conclusion that racial redistricting for the U.S. House of Representatives promotes liberal policy outcomes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
