Abstract
This article, which appeared in the Fall 2003 issue of ACR Resolution, discusses the major issues and stakeholders involved in the dispute over racial profiling. It describes the issue as classic conflict in which the parties - political leaders, police executives, line officers, civil rights leaders, and residents - are entrenched in opposing positions. They also have shared values and interests that can only be advanced by cooperation and trust. Existing legal strategies - politically charged class action lawsuits leading to negotiated consent decrees supervised by plaintiffs' attorneys - have not proven successful. The tools of conflict resolution could help improve these outcomes. The authors, one White and one African-American, suggest that Americans should not expect to become color-blind when discussing issues such as racial profiling, but rather to become more conscious of the ways that race distorts and colors what we see. So that we can hear.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
