Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectives: This study examines whether there are racial/ethnic differences in perceived need for mental health care among those with a mood and/or anxiety disorder in 1990–1992 and 2001–2003 in the US. Then among those with perceived need, we examine whether racial/ethnic disparities in use of mental health care existed in both time periods.Design: Using data from the 1990–1992 National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) and 2001–2003 National Comorbidity Survey – Replication (NCS-R), the study analyzes whether whites differed from blacks and Latinos in rates of perceived need among those with a mood and/or anxiety disorder in 1990–1992 and 2001–2003. Then among those with a disorder and perceived need, rates of mental health care use for whites are compared to black rates and Latino rates in within the 1990–1992 cohort and then within the 2001–2003 cohort.Results: There were no statistical racial/ethnic differences in perceived need in both time periods. Among those with perceived need in 1990–1992, there were no statistical racial/ethnic disparities in the use of mental health care. However, in 2001–2003, disparities in mental health care use existed among those with perceived need.Conclusions: The emergence of racial/ethnic disparities in use of mental health care among those with a perceived need for care in 2001–2003 suggests that personal/cultural belief along with issues concerning access and quality of mental health care may create barriers to receiving perceived needed care. More research is needed to understand why these disparities emerged among those with perceived need in the latter time period and whether these disparities continue to exist in more recent years.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.