Abstract

Prior evidence suggests that racial differences exist in tau biomarkers in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD). Whether this reported disparity is associated with a differential level of neurodegeneration and disease stage or with underlying mechanisms separate from amyloid or tau is unclear. To compare cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in African American and white individuals with normal cognition and MCI, to estimate race-based cutoffs for these biomarkers that maximize diagnostic discrimination between normal cognition and MCI, and to study the association of demographic characteristics, cognitive performance, and common vascular risk factors with these differences. This case-control study conducted from March 1, 2016, through January 31, 2019, included participants in the Brain Stress Hypertension and Aging Research Program cohort undergoing baseline assessment. Participants were 50 years or older and recruited from the Atlanta, Georgia, area. Self-reported race and cognitive status categorized using modified Petersen criteria and clinical consensus diagnosis. Levels of β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ1-42), tau, and phosphorylated tau 181 (pTau181), the ratio of tau or pTau181 to Aβ1-42, and hippocampal volume on magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Data from 362 study participants were analyzed (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [7.9] years), of whom 152 (42.0%) were African American, 230 (63.5%) were women, and 189 (52.2%) had MCI. After adjustment for demographic characteristics and cognitive performance, lower mean (SE) levels were observed in African American vs white individuals with MCI for tau (52.40 [5.90] vs 78.98 [5.02] pg/mL; P = .001) and pTau181 (15.42 [2.06] vs 25.24 [1.75] pg/mL; P = .001) and a lower pTau181 to Aβ1-42 ratio (0.07 [0.02] vs 0.14 [0.01]; P = .003). There were no racial differences in the normal cognition group or in hippocampal volumes in the MCI group. Cutoffs for CSF biomarkers were higher for Aβ1-42 in African American relative to white individuals (208 [95% CI, 126-321] vs 197 [95% CI, 183-245] pg/mL) and lower for tau (51 [95% CI, 31-59] vs 59 [95% CI, 56-92] pg/mL) and pTau181 (12 [95% CI, 12-19] vs 20 [95% CI, 12-27] pg/mL) levels. Cutoffs for the pTau181 to Aβ1-42 ratio were 0.05 (95% CI, 0.03-0.12) for African American participants and 0.05 (95% CI, 0.05-0.13) for white participants. This study found that African American individuals had lower levels of tau-based biomarkers that were not likely explained by the degree of disease stage or neurodegeneration reflected by hippocampal volumes. This study suggests that race is an important factor when interpreting CSF biomarkers, especially in the clinical diagnosis of prodromal AD. It appears that using the pTau181 to Aβ1-42 ratio may ameliorate these differences.

Highlights

  • Identifying the early stages of Alzheimer disease (AD) is becoming an important part of the clinical assessment of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and is standard in almost all recent clinical trials of AD prevention and therapies.[1,2,3] This prodromal stage heavily relies on identifying evidence of AD neuropathologic changes, namely β-amyloidosis and tauopathy.[3]

  • After adjustment for demographic characteristics and cognitive performance, lower mean (SE) levels were observed in African American vs white individuals with MCI for tau (52.40 [5.90] vs 78.98 [5.02] pg/mL; P = .001) and pTau[181] (15.42 [2.06] vs 25.24 [1.75] pg/mL; P = .001) and a lower pTau[181] to β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ1-42) ratio (0.07 [0.02] vs 0.14 [0.01]; P = .003)

  • Cutoffs for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers were higher for Aβ1-42 in African American relative to white individuals (208 [95% CI, 126-321] vs 197 [95% CI, 183-245] pg/mL) and lower for tau (51 [95% CI, 31-59] vs 59 [95% CI, 56-92] pg/mL) and pTau[181] (12 [95% CI, 12-19] vs 20 [95% CI, 12-27] pg/mL) levels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Identifying the early stages of Alzheimer disease (AD) is becoming an important part of the clinical assessment of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and is standard in almost all recent clinical trials of AD prevention and therapies.[1,2,3] This prodromal stage heavily relies on identifying evidence of AD neuropathologic changes, namely β-amyloidosis and tauopathy.[3] The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association issued a biological research framework for the predementia stages of AD based on the presence of β-amyloidosis, tauopathy, and neurodegeneration.[4] This biological framework depends on thresholds or cutoffs of the relevant biomarkers for detection of amyloidosis, tauopathy, and neurodegeneration.[4]. Whether prior observations need to be incorporated into our interpretation of CSF biomarkers in nonwhite individuals remains unclear

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call