Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate differences in sleep quality by race in participants with and without a prior myocardial infarction (MI). DesignCase-control study. SettingEmory-affiliated hospitals in Atlanta, Georgia. ParticipantsTwo hundred seventy-three individuals (190 Black) ≤60 years of age with a verified MI in the previous 8 months, and 100 community controls (44 Black) without a history of MI. MeasurementsSleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Psychological factors were assessed using standardized questionnaires and clinical risk factors through medical history and chart review. ResultsA significant interaction existed between race and MI status on sleep quality (P= .01), such that Black individuals with a history of MI, but not controls, reported worse sleep quality than their non-Black counterparts. Among MI cases, being Black was independently associated with higher PSQI scores after adjusting for baseline demographics (B = 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.17, 3.17, P = .006). Clinical risk factors, psychological factors and socioeconomic status (household income and years of education) all contributed equally to explain race-related disparities in sleep among MI cases. After further adjustment for these factors, the association was attenuated and no longer significant (B = 0.70, 95% confidence interval = −0.10, 1.21, P = .26). ConclusionBlack post-MI patients, but not healthy controls, have significantly poorer sleep quality than non-Blacks. This difference is driven by a combination of factors, including clinical risk factors, psychological factors as well as adverse socioeconomic conditions among Black individuals with MI.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.