Racial Differences in Detection of Glaucoma Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Bruch Membrane Opening Minimum Rim Width

Abstract

To compare the sensitivities and specificities of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) and Bruch membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) reference database-based criteria for detection of glaucoma in individuals of European descent (ED) and individuals of African descent (AD). Comparative diagnostic analysis by race METHODS: 382 eyes of 255 glaucoma patients (ED=170, AD=85) and 94 eyes of 50 healthy individuals (ED=30, AD=20) with global and sectoral RNFLT and BMO-MRW measured with Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT) were included. Six diagnostic criteria were evaluated: global measurement below the 5th or 1st percentile, ≥1 of the 6 sector measurements below the 5th or 1st percentile, and superotemporal (ST) and/or inferotemporal (IT) measurement below the 5th or 1st percentile. The sensitivities and specificities of these measurements for detection of glaucoma were compared using bootstrapping methods. ST and/or IT RNFLT below the 5th percentile has the best performance for detection of glaucoma among RNFLT classifications with a sensitivity (95% CI) of 89.5% (86.1, 92.5) and specificity of 87.2% (77.8, 95.1). In AD individuals, sensitivities of ST and IT RNFLT and BMO-MRW measurements below the 5th percentile criteria were lower than in ED individuals (RNFLT: 83.7% vs 92.5%, and BMO-MRW: 72.1% vs 88.5%, respectively), as well as specificities (AD RNFLT: 73.7% and BMO-MRW: 89.5% vs ED RNFLT: 96.4% and BMO-MRW: 98.2%, respectively). RNFLT and BMO-MRW had consistently lower diagnostic performance in AD individuals compared with ED individuals. BMO-MRW criteria might fail to detect as many as one-third of eyes with glaucoma, specifically in AD individuals. With the current reference database, RNFLT, and especially BMO-MRW, criteria are not adequate for diagnosing glaucoma in AD individuals.