Abstract

BackgroundAlthough intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is more common among African-Americans, data on the burden of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) among different races is limited. The purpose of this study is to compare the number, associated factors, and topography of CMBs between African-American and Caucasian populations in the Mid-South United States. MethodsUsing natural language processing, we extracted all brain MRIs performed during a 2-year period (2012-2013) when the report indicated the presence of CMB. All the extracted MRI studies were evaluated for number and location of CMBs, prior stroke, and deep white matter lesion. Negative binomial regression was used to model for the overdispersed count data. ResultsA total 167 patients (mean age was 63 ± 15 years, 49% men, 77% African-American, median CMB count: 8) with 1 or more CMBs on their brain MRI were included in this study. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of CMB locations (P = .086), but there was a significant difference between African-American and Caucasian patients in terms of number of CMBs (16.5 ± 18 versus 6.5 ± 5.5, P < .001). The prevalence of multiple CMBs (CMBs ≥ 5) was similar among African-Americans and Caucasians (72% versus 55%, P = .062). After adjusting for potential confounders, the African-American race was not independently associated with a higher CMB burden (P = .073). ConclusionAfrican-American race was not independently associated with a higher rate of CMB burden when compared to Caucasians after adjusting for potential confounders. We also did not observe a significant racial difference regarding the location and prevalence of multiple CMBs (CMBs ≥ 5).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.