Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare cesarean delivery rates and indications by race/ethnicity among nulliparous women with term, singleton, vertex presentation deliveries.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of nulliparous women delivering term, singleton, vertex neonates at Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 1/1/2016 to 6/30/2017. Women with cesarean for elective, malpresentation, or previa were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for maternal, neonatal, and facility factors were used to assess the likelihood of cesarean by race/ethnicity. Further modeling was performed to examine odds of cesarean for the indications of failure to progress and fetal intolerance by race/ethnicity.ResultsThe cohort of 16,587 racially/ethnically diverse women meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria consisted of 41.62% White, 27.73% Asian, 22.11% Hispanic, 5.32% Black, and 3.21% multiple race/other women. In adjusted logistic regression models, all race and ethnic categories had higher odds of cesarean deliveries in comparison to White women. Black women had the highest odds of cesarean delivery (adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.45–2.06), followed by Asian (aOR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.45–2.06), multiple race/other (aOR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.17–1.80), and Hispanic (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.28–1.59) women. Compared with White women, Asian (aOR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.22–1.74) and Hispanic (aOR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.03–1.52) women had higher odds of failure to progress as the indication. Among women with failure to progress, Black (aOR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30–0.81), Hispanic (aOR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.53–0.87), and Asian (aOR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.96) women were less likely than White women to reach 10 cm dilation. Compared with White women, Black women were more likely to have cesarean delivery for fetal intolerance (aOR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.10–2.07). Among women with fetal intolerance of labor, there were no significant differences by race/ethnicity for Apgar score or neonatal intensive care unit admission.ConclusionsRace/ethnicity was significantly associated with the odds of cesarean and indication. All other race/ethnicity groups had higher odds of cesarean compared with White women. Compared with White women, Black women had greater odds of fetal intolerance as an indication, while Hispanic and Asian women had greater odds of failure to progress. Maternal, neonate, and facility factors for cesarean delivery did not explain the observed disparities in cesarean delivery rates.

Highlights

  • Cesarean delivery is the most common surgical procedure for women in the United States (U.S.) [1]

  • In the United States, nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) cesarean delivery has increased from 18.4% in 1997 to 26.9% in 2013, with rates 5% greater in non-Hispanic Black women and 1% greater in Hispanic women compared with non-Hispanic White women [3]

  • Among women who underwent cesarean delivery for the indication failure to progress, Black, Hispanic, and Asian women were less likely than White women to reach 10 cm dilation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cesarean delivery is the most common surgical procedure for women in the United States (U.S.) [1]. Of four million U.S deliveries per year, one in three is delivered by cesarean [1]. Women undergoing cesarean delivery are exposed to the inherent risks of surgery, maternal morbidity and mortality, and adverse neonatal outcomes [2]. In the United States, nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) cesarean delivery has increased from 18.4% in 1997 to 26.9% in 2013, with rates 5% greater in non-Hispanic Black women and 1% greater in Hispanic women compared with non-Hispanic White women [3]. The racial/ethnic differences in cesarean delivery rates. J. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities have persisted over time, even for women considered at low risk for cesarean delivery [3]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.