Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Prevalence and Treatment Patterns for Neovascular Glaucoma in the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry

Abstract

PurposeTo examine racial and ethnic differences in the prevalence and treatment patterns for neovascular glaucoma (NVG) in at-risk individuals in the American Academy of Ophthalmology (Academy) IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight). ParticipantsEyes in the IRIS Registry with a retinal ischemia based on a history of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and/or ocular ischemic syndrome (OIS). MethodsRace and ethnicity was defined as Asian, Black, Hispanic/Latino, Non-Hispanic White, and Other/Unknown. In eyes with retinal ischemia, the outcome was neovascular glaucoma (NVG). In eyes with NVG, outcomes included treatment of retinal ischemia with pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP), and surgery to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) with trabeculectomy, tube shunt, and cyclophotocoagulation (CPC). Covariates included age, sex, region of residence, insurance type, smoking status, and systemic and ocular comorbidities. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine adjusted associations between race and ethnicity and NVG and each type of NVG treatment. Main Outcome MeasuresIncidence of NVG, PRP, trabeculectomy, tube shunt, CPC, and any IOP-lowering surgery ResultsOf 312,106 eyes with retinal ischemia, there were 5,885 (1.9%) with NVG. Compared to eyes of individuals who identified as Non-Hispanic White, eyes of individuals who were Black and Hispanic/Latino had higher hazards of NVG in adjusted analyses (hazards ratio [HR]=1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.15, 1.43 for Black; HR=1.32, 95% CI=1.17, 1.47 for Hispanic/Latino). Compared to eyes of individuals who were Non-Hispanic White, there was higher hazards of trabeculectomy in eyes of individuals who were Hispanic/Latino (adjusted HR=1.91, 95% CI=1.08, 3.39) and higher hazards of tube shunt (adjusted HR=1.35, 95% CI=1.07, 1.69) and of any IOP-lowering surgery (adjusted HR=1.29, 95% CI=1.09, 1.53) in eyes of individuals who were Black. There were no statistically significant differences in the hazards of PRP or CPC. ConclusionsEyes of Black and Hispanic/Latino individuals with retinal ischemia in the IRIS Registry had higher likelihood of NVG and of IOP-lowering surgery for NVG. Further study is needed to examine the medical and social factors that preclude optimal management of diabetic eye disease, in order to prevent its blinding complications.