Abstract

Background: Cross-sectional studies suggest urban greenness is unequally distributed by neighborhood demographics. However, the extent to which inequalities in greenness have changed over time remains unknown. Methods: We estimated 2001 and 2011 greenness using Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite-derived normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) in 59,483 urban census tracts in the contiguous U.S. We fit spatial error models to estimate the association between baseline census tract demographic composition in 2000 and (1) 2001 greenness and (2) change in greenness between 2001 and 2011. Results: In models adjusted for population density, climatic factors, housing tenure, and Index of Concentration at the Extremes for income (ICE), an SD increase in percent White residents (a 30% increase) in 2000 was associated with 0.021 (95% CI: 0.018, 0.023) higher 2001 NDVI. We observed a stepwise reduction in 2001 NDVI with increased concentration of poverty. Tracts with a higher proportion of Hispanic residents in 2000 lost a small, statistically significant amount of greenness between 2001 and 2011 while tracts with higher proportions of Whites experienced a small, statistically significant increase in greenness over the same period. Conclusions: Census tracts with a higher proportion of racial/ethnic minorities, compared to a higher proportion of White residents, had less greenness in 2001 and lost more greenness between 2001 and 2011. Policies are needed to increase greenness, a health-promoting neighborhood asset, in disadvantaged communities.

Highlights

  • Urban greenness—or vegetation—provides an array of benefits that may promote health.Exposure to natural environments appears to stimulate healing and reduce stress [1,2,3,4]

  • We found that the probability of living in a neighborhood without tree canopy cover and with a majority of its land area covered in impervious surfaces was higher in more racially segregated metropolitan areas compared to less segregated metropolitan areas for all racial/ethnic groups in the United States [31]

  • Census tract boundaries are drawn to reflect similar population sizes, usually 2500 to 8000 individuals, who share similar socioeconomic characteristics when possible. They vary in size based on population density; in this study urban census tracts had a median size of 3.6 km2 (IQR: 1.5–13.6 km2 )

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urban greenness—or vegetation—provides an array of benefits that may promote health.Exposure to natural environments appears to stimulate healing and reduce stress [1,2,3,4]. Cross-sectional studies suggest urban greenness is unequally distributed by neighborhood demographics. Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite-derived normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) in 59,483 urban census tracts in the contiguous U.S We fit spatial error models to estimate the association between baseline census tract demographic composition in 2000 and (1) 2001 greenness and (2) change in greenness between 2001 and 2011. Tracts with a higher proportion of Hispanic residents in 2000 lost a small, statistically significant amount of greenness between 2001 and 2011 while tracts with higher proportions of Whites experienced a small, statistically significant increase in greenness over the same period. Policies are needed to increase greenness, a health-promoting neighborhood asset, in disadvantaged communities

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call