Abstract
Although the proportion of black, brown and indigenous electoral candidates in Brazil is close to the proportion of blacks, browns and indigenous in the general population, the proportion elected to the country’s Federal Congress is significantly lower. Statistical techniques such as linear or logistic regression are typically used to estimate the effect of a particular variable such as color/race or gender on a candidate’s electoral performance. However, in Brazilian elections, characterized by substantive, asymmetrical differences such as extreme variations in campaign finance distribution, the efficacy of these types of regression models is limited. Such being the case in Brazil's open list proportional representation system, we propose quantile regression as the most suitable means for estimating the relationship between voting and other variables such as race/color, because it enables us to estimate relationships between the variables of interest across several distribution quantiles. Quantile regression models show that black and brown candidates get as many as 40% fewer votes than white candidates in higher vote distribution quantiles. Furthermore, analysis of access to campaign financing finds that black and brown candidates on average garner only 75% of the funds available to white candidates at quantile 80 of campaign finance distribution. This drops to 65% at quantile 90.
Highlights
Race and Competitiveness in Brazilian Elections: Evaluating the Chances of NonWhite Candidates through Quantile Regression Analysis of Brazil's 2014 Congressional Elections
This becomes clear when we look at the political underrepresentation of some sectors of Brazilian society such as workers, women and blacks
Non-white women are subjected to a double filter to political access; analyses of candidacy nominations find that the largest discrepancy between the candidate percentages and population size occurs in this category (CAMPOS and MACHADO, 2015b)
Summary
Incumbency and campaign spending variables (Models 05, 06, and 07) affect the relationship between race/color and votes. In Models 05 and 06, which jointly consider the effects of sex, education level, class, incumbency and campaign spending, the average number of votes for non-white candidates is approximately 22% and 17% lower, respectively, than the overall average number of votes for whites. This demonstrates that even when controlling for these other variables there is still a causal relationship between non-white status and number of votes. 03, factoring in the specifications of Model 0516 in Table 02, with the respective coefficients of the variables of sex, education, class and incumbency
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.