Abstract

Objective: To determine and compare the reasons and pattern of extraction of first permanent molars (FPM) in 3 UK dental hospitals.Design: Data were collected prospectively from 300 children attending Manchester Dental Hospital (MDH), Liverpool Dental Hospital (LDH) and Charles Clifford Dental Hospital, Sheffield (CCDH) who required extractions of at least one FPM. Information recorded included age, FPM extracted, reason for extractions, previous treatment, method of extraction, and whether patients had previous extractions.Result: The mean age in months was 129 (Std 22.7), 139 (Std 29.4), and 133 (Std 26.8) for MDH, LDH, CCDH respectively. 45% and 48% of children had four FPM extracted at MDH & CCDH, respectively, compared to 25% in LDH. The main reason for extraction (70%) was caries with poor prognosis, followed by caries and compensating extraction (14%). Molar Incisal Hypoplasia was the reason for extraction in 11% of cases. General anaesthesia was the main anaesthetic method used with 77%, 55%, and 47% in MDH, LDH and CCDH, respectively. Local anaesthesia was used in 43% of cases in LDH in comparison to 12% and 22% in MDH and CCDH, respectively. 68% of children had received no previous treatment to the FPM and only 5% had fissure sealants placed. 40% of children had previous extractions.Conclusion: The children who are attending our hospitals for extractions of FPM tend to be older than the recommended age for achieving maximum space closure. This study highlights the need for extensive prevention programs targeted at those children with high caries risk.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call