Abstract

This essay presents a critical overview of van Gulik's approach to the connoisseurship of Chinese painting and calligraphy by analyzing his three published books on the subject. Disenchanted with the primitive state of the study of Chinese art in the English-speaking world in the 1930s. van Gulik sought to establish a new method and new terminology for analyzing Chinese pictorial art that conformed to the modern scientific spirit. He disparaged most traditional Chinese scholars, finding inspiration only in the Song artist and critic Mi Fu 米芾 whose precise language and empiricist approach to connoisseurship impressed the young Sinologist as the embodiment of the scientific spirit. When compared to the strictly rationalistic criteria adopted by the practitioners of scientific connoisseurship in Europe and America, however, van Gulik's own performance appears wanting. Although van Gulik's achievements do not measure up to his own ambitious standards, in valuing mounting and other aspects of the material craft of painting, he anticipated the recent turn to material culture among historians of science, technology, and art in East Asia at the beginning of the twenty-first century.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.