Abstract

We initiate the study of applications of machine learning to Seiberg duality, focusing on the case of quiver gauge theories, a problem also of interest in mathematics in the context of cluster algebras. Within the general theme of Seiberg duality, we define and explore a variety of interesting questions, broadly divided into the binary determination of whether a pair of theories picked from a series of duality classes are dual to each other, as well as the multi-class determination of the duality class to which a given theory belongs. We study how the performance of machine learning depends on several variables, including number of classes and mutation type (finite or infinite). In addition, we evaluate the relative advantages of Naive Bayes classifiers versus Convolutional Neural Networks. Finally, we also investigate how the results are affected by the inclusion of additional data, such as ranks of gauge/flavor groups and certain variables motivated by the existence of underlying Diophantine equations. In all questions considered, high accuracy and confidence can be achieved.

Highlights

  • To provide the readers with an idea of the machine learning performance at a glance, we provide here a brief description of the problem styles addressed in this paper, a list of the quivers used to generate the mutation classes examined in the investigations, and a table summarizing the investigations’ key results

  • We first list the conclusions for Naive Bayes (NB) and Mathematica classifier: (i) The number of different mutation classes is the dominant influence in our machine learning

  • Other factors are outcompeted for influence on the learning when there is a larger number of mutation classes

Read more

Summary

Summary of results

To provide the readers with an idea of the machine learning performance at a glance, we provide here a brief description of the problem styles addressed in this paper, a list of the quivers used to generate the mutation classes examined in the investigations, and a table summarizing the investigations’ key results

Data format
Quivers considered
Investigation results
Seiberg duality
Mutation of cluster algebras
RECOGNIZING MUTATIONS
Classifying two mutation classes
Fixing the Method
Two classes revisit
Classifying more mutation classes
Multiclass classifications
Classifying against random antisymmetric matrices
EXAMPLES WITH DIFFERENT TYPES
Dynkin and affine types
T Type
Splitting the dataset
Adding ranks of nodes for NB
Adding Diophantine variables
Adding ranks of nodes for NN
Finite and infinite mutations
Predicting matrices at middle depths
CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK
Mathematica’s CLASSIFY
The Naive Bayes method
PYTHON’s CNNs
Findings
Measures of the machine’s performance

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.