Abstract

This article questions the assumptions, sustainability and ethics of endless economic growth on the basis of environmental science, ecological economics and ecological ethics. It considers the impossibility and unsustainability of endless physical growth on a finite planet. It considers the indicators of environmental degradation (all increasing) and argues that society’s addiction to endless growth is irresponsible. It discusses the key problem of denial, and how this blocks us from finding workable solutions. It discusses how in theory GDP could continue to grow modestly in the future if we adopted a steady-state economy where growth was not caused by an expanding population or resource use. However, this model is currently unpopular, with many advocating the green and circular economies that are partial solutions, and which justify ongoing growth through a fantasy of absolute decoupling. I discuss the need for society to change its anthropocentric worldview to one of ecocentrism. I then question whether the UN Sustainable Development Goals are actually ecologically sustainable. I discuss how, when we ignore the problems of an endlessly growing economy, we create significant risk to society. Rather than a focus only on ‘sustainable economic growth’, I suggest it is time to focus centrally on an ecologically sustainable economy and future.

Highlights

  • This is a Special Issue on ‘Sustainable Economic Growth’ in the Journal of Risk and Financial Management to which I was asked to submit an article

  • My questioning of the premise that ‘sustainable economic growth’ is automatically good is based on environmental science, ecological economics and ecological ethics

  • The question I suggest one should really ask is whether sustainable economic growth will be ecologically sustainable, or whether society will continue to proceed in denial, and pretend that economic growth is sacrosanct, and must be prioritized and expanded above all things, including an ecologically sustainable future? Many in society speak glibly of the ‘green’ and ‘circular’ economies, but these are largely based on the fantasy of absolute decoupling

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This is a Special Issue on ‘Sustainable Economic Growth’ in the Journal of Risk and Financial Management to which I was asked to submit an article. Given the prevailing view in Western society that ‘all growth is good’, I will here be something of a heretic—as I will question the assumptions, ethics and sustainability of the premise that economic growth can (and must) increase forever. My questioning of the premise that ‘sustainable economic growth’ is automatically good is based on environmental science, ecological economics and ecological ethics. My purpose in this article is to take a big picture overview to promote discussion on what I argue is a commonly accepted dogma in the field—that all economic growth is good.

Indicators of the Environmental Crisis
17 October
Questioning the Assumptions of Neoclassical Economics
The Key Problem of Denial
Can the Economy Grow If We Do Not Increase the Population or Resource Use?
The Worldview and Ethics of Endless Growth
Are the SDGs Actually Sustainable?
11. Implications for Academic and Economic Sectors
Findings
12. Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call