Abstract
The presumption of innocence is the primary value underpinning the trial. It is important to work out how to maintain the rights of defendants while better accommodating child complainants and witnesses in the pursuit of fact. One approach is to improve how children's evidence is challenged in order that the fact-finder may have a better opportunity to assess the evidence. This article looks at the viability of achieving this aim through the use of intermediaries to question children on behalf of counsel. Three intermediary models were explored through mock examinations of a “child” witness. Reflecting on these, the article documents some of the issues and the potential benefits and risks of different intermediary models to improve this questioning of children, particularly during cross-examination.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
