Abstract
We prove that the probability of crossing a large square in quenched Voronoi percolation converges to 1/2 at criticality, confirming a conjecture of Benjamini, Kalai and Schramm from 1999. The main new tools are a quenched version of the box-crossing property for Voronoi percolation at criticality, and an Efron–Stein type bound on the variance of the probability of the crossing event in terms of the sum of the squares of the influences. As a corollary of the proof, we moreover obtain that the quenched crossing event at criticality is almost surely noise sensitive.
Highlights
The noise sensitivity of a Boolean function was introduced in 1999 in a seminal paper of Benjamini, Kalai and Schramm [5], and has since developed into an important area of probability theory, linking discrete Fourier analysis with percolation theory and combinatorics
We prove that the probability of crossing a large square in quenched Voronoi percolation converges to 1/2 at criticality, confirming a conjecture of Benjamini, Kalai and Schramm from 1999
The main new tools are a quenched version of the box-crossing property for Voronoi percolation at criticality, and an Efron–Stein type bound on the variance of the probability of the crossing event in terms of the sum of the squares of the influences
Summary
The noise sensitivity of a Boolean function was introduced in 1999 in a seminal paper of Benjamini, Kalai and Schramm [5], and has since developed into an important area of probability theory (see, e.g., [13,14,22]), linking discrete Fourier analysis with percolation theory and combinatorics. In order to use the algorithm method we will need to prove a 1-arm estimate that will follow from a quenched version of the box-crossing property for Voronoi percolation at criticality. This result gives bounds on the probability that a rectangle (of fixed aspect ratio) is crossed at criticality, and is an analogue of the celebrated results for bond percolation on Z2 of Russo [21] and Seymour and Welsh [23]. The full box-crossing property in the annealed setting was obtained only very recently, by the fourth author [26] We remark that this result will play an important role in our proof of Theorem 1.4, below. By (2), we obtain Theorem 1.2, and by the box-crossing property for annealed Voronoi percolation [9,26], we obtain Theorem 1.4
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.