Abstract
Let $\mathfrak{g}$ be a finite-dimensional semisimple complex Lie algebra and $\theta$ an involutive automorphism of $\mathfrak{g}$. According to G. Letzter, S. Kolb and M. Balagovi\'c the fixed-point subalgebra $\mathfrak{k} = \mathfrak{g}^\theta$ has a quantum counterpart $B$, a coideal subalgebra of the Drinfeld-Jimbo quantum group $U_q(\mathfrak{g})$ possessing a universal K-matrix $\mathcal{K}$. The objects $\theta$, $\mathfrak{k}$, $B$ and $\mathcal{K}$ can all be described in terms of Satake diagrams. In the present work we extend this construction to generalized Satake diagrams, combinatorial data first considered by A. Heck. A generalized Satake diagram naturally defines a semisimple automorphism $\theta$ of $\mathfrak{g}$ restricting to the standard Cartan subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}$ as an involution. It also defines a subalgebra $\mathfrak{k}\subset \mathfrak{g}$ satisfying $\mathfrak{k} \cap \mathfrak{h} = \mathfrak{h}^\theta$, but not necessarily a fixed-point subalgebra. The subalgebra $\mathfrak{k}$ can be quantized to a coideal subalgebra of $U_q(\mathfrak{g})$ endowed with a universal K-matrix in the sense of Kolb and Balagovi\'c. We conjecture that all such coideal subalgebras of $U_q(\mathfrak{g})$ arise from generalized Satake diagrams in this way.
Highlights
Given a finite-dimensional semisimple complex Lie algebra g and an involutive Lie algebra automorphism θ ∈ Aut(g), a symmetric pair is a pair (g, k), where k = gθ is the corresponding fixed-point subalgebra of g, see [1, 31]
We introduce generalized Satake diagrams and explain how they emerge in the work of Heck
In Theorem 3.1, the main result of this section, we show that k satisfies k ∩ h = hθ precisely if (X, τ ) is a generalized Satake diagram
Summary
It has a distinguished factor called quasi K-matrix, introduced in [4] for certain coideal subalgebras of Uq(slN ) and in a more general setting in [2] This object plays a prominent role in the theory of canonical bases for quantum symmetric pairs [5]; for a historical note we refer the reader to [5, Remark 4.9]. From this result and computations for Uq(g) whose vector representation is of dimension at most 9 (that is, with g of types Bn, Cn, Dn (n 4) and G2), one obtains a classification of solutions K of (1.5) for those pairs (Uq(g), ρ) One can match this list of solutions K one-to-one with a list of generalized Satake diagrams (X, τ ) by checking which K satisfies Kρ(b) = ρ(φ(b))K for all b ∈ B = B(X, τ ), that is, the image of (1.1) under ρ. The approach in [3] requires certain constraints on γi and σi under the transformation q → q−1 which are given in (4.22) and (4.23) in the present notation and generality
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.