Abstract

Performance of the "quasi-REML" method for estimating correlations between a continuous trait and a categorical trait, and between two categorical traits, was studied with Monte Carlo simulations. Three continuous, correlated traits were simulated for identical populations and three scenarios with either no selection, selection for one moderately heritable trait (Trait 1, h2 = .25), and selection for the same trait plus confounding between sires and management groups. The "true" environmental correlations between Traits 2 (h2 = .10) and 3 (h2 = .05) were always of the same absolute size (.20), but further data scenarios were generated by setting the sign of environmental correlation to either positive or negative. Observations for Traits 2 and 3 were then reassigned to binomial categories to simulate health or reproductive traits with incidences of 15 and 5%, respectively. Genetic correlations (r(g12), r(g13), and r(g23) and environmental correlations (r(e12), r(e13), and r(e23)) were estimated for the underlying continuous scale (REML) and the visible categorical scales ("quasi-REML") with linear multiple-trait sire and animal models. Contrary to theory, practically all "quasi-REML" genetic correlations were underestimated to some extent with the sire and animal models. Selection inflated this negative bias for sire model estimates, and the sign of r(e23) noticeably affected r(g23) estimates for the animal model, with greater bias and SD for estimates when the "true" r(e23) was positive. Transformed "quasi-REML" environmental correlations between a continuous and a categorical trait were estimated with good efficiency and little bias, and corresponding correlations between two categorical traits were systematically overestimated. Confounding between sires and contemporary groups negatively affected all correlation estimates on the underlying and the visible scales, especially for sire model "quasi-REML" estimates of genetic correlation. Selection, data structure, and the (co)variance structure influences how well correlations involving categorical traits are estimated with "quasi-REML" methods.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.