Abstract

Established waveguide fabrication technologies on lithium niobate (LN) and potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) were revisited, and a comparative analysis of their performance for type-0 quasi-phase matched second-harmonic generation at 1.55 µm was provided based on literature data and our simulations. This analysis aided identifying gaps where the waveguide performance is below the theoretical predictions, and the possible reasons are discussed. It provides the reader with a roadmap for choosing the most appropriate waveguide type and material choice between LN and KTP for desired performance of targeted applications.

Highlights

  • Nonlinear optics (NLO) is an ever-growing field of research enabled by lasers.[1]

  • quasi-phase matching (QPM) consists in periodically resetting the phase mismatch between the interacting waves in order to force them to be in phase as they propagate along the nonlinear crystal

  • If annealed proton-exchanged (APE) waveguides are processed in a lithium-rich melt, lithium ions (Li+)ions will diffuse into the surface layer, while H+-ions will diffuse out

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Nonlinear optics (NLO) is an ever-growing field of research enabled by lasers.[1]. Because strong light intensities are required for NLO effects to become relevant, such effects can be greatly enhanced when used in waveguides in which light is tightly confined. Toward shorter wavelengths, KTP is a more suitable material It exhibits a high optical nonlinearity, excellent mechanical and thermal properties, and high resistance to photorefractive damage,[17,18] as well as to green- or blue-induced infrared absorption especially in the continuous-wave regime. If the period is made in the sub-micrometer range, counter-propagating parametric interactions can be analyzed,[22] in which a pump photon generates a forwardpropagating signal photon and a narrow bandwidth backwardpropagating idler photon This process is highly interesting, for instance, for the generation of counter-propagating entangled photon pairs.[23] KTP and RKTP offer the possibility of groupvelocity matching,[24,25] enabling a separable joint-spectral-amplitude diagram, with applications in quantum information technology.[23,26]. It provides a roadmap for choosing the most appropriate waveguide type and material choice between LN and KTP to optimize the performance of targeted applications

A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT WAVEGUIDE TECHNOLOGIES
Waveguides on lithium niobate
Ti-indiffused channel waveguides on LN
Zn-indiffused waveguides
Proton-exchanged and annealed proton-exchanged waveguides
Reverse proton-exchanged waveguides
Thin-film waveguides
Waveguides on KTP
Ion-exchange in KTP and RKTP
Segmented ion-exchanged waveguides
Ion-exchanged channel waveguides
Ion-exchanged ridge waveguides
Thin films
Simulations constraints and parameters
Simulation results
COMPARISON AND DISCUSSION
Findings
CONCLUSIONS

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.