Abstract

An important problem in phylogenetics is the construction of phylogenetic trees. One way to approach this problem, known as the supertree method, involves inferring a phylogenetic tree with leaves consisting of a set X of species from a collection of trees, each having leaf-set some subset of X. In the 1980s, Colonius and Schulze gave certain inference rules for deciding when a collection of 4-leaved trees, one for each 4-element subset of X, can be simultaneously displayed by a single supertree with leaf-set X. Recently, it has become of interest to extend this and related results to phylogenetic networks. These are a generalization of phylogenetic trees which can be used to represent reticulate evolution (where species can come together to form a new species). It has recently been shown that a certain type of phylogenetic network, called a (unrooted) level-1 network, can essentially be constructed from 4-leaved trees. However, the problem of providing appropriate inference rules for such networks remains unresolved. Here, we show that by considering 4-leaved networks, called quarnets, as opposed to 4-leaved trees, it is possible to provide such rules. In particular, we show that these rules can be used to characterize when a collection of quarnets, one for each 4-element subset of X, can all be simultaneously displayed by a level-1 network with leaf-set X. The rules are an intriguing mixture of tree inference rules, and an inference rule for building up a cyclic ordering of X from orderings on subsets of X of size 4. This opens up several new directions of research for inferring phylogenetic networks from smaller ones, which could yield new algorithms for solving the supernetwork problem in phylogenetics.

Highlights

  • One of the main goals in phylogenetics is to develop methods for constructing evolutionary trees, the tree-of-life being a prime example of such a tree (Letunic and Bork2016)

  • (iii) implies (i), thereby completing the proof of the theorem. Note that it follows from Theorem 4 that we can decide whether or not a given minimally dense set of qnets F is displayed by a level-1 binary phylogenetic network on n ≥ 2 leaves in O(n5) time

  • We have shown that by considering quarnets we can define natural inference rules, as well as the concept of quarnet closure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the main goals in phylogenetics is to develop methods for constructing evolutionary trees, the tree-of-life being a prime example of such a tree When two viruses recombine to form a new virus (e.g. swine flu), this is not best represented by a tree as it involves species combining together to form a new one rather than splitting apart In such cases, phylogenetic networks provide a more accurate alternative to trees and there has been much recent work on such structures (see e.g. Steel 2016, Chapter 10 for a recent review). We circumvent these problems by considering a certain type of subnetwork of level-1 network called a quarnet instead of using quartet trees. This can be thought of as the collection of quarnets that is obtained by applying inference rules to a given collection of quarnets until no further quarnets are generated We show that this has similar properties to the so-called semi-dyadic closure of a set of quartets (see Theorem 4). We conclude with a brief discussion of some possible further directions

Definitions
Quarnets
A Characterization of Level-1 Quartet Systems
Quarnet Inference Rules and Closure
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call