Quarantined histories: Sindh and the question of historiography in Colonial India—Part II

Abstract

AbstractThis essay examines histories of colonial British India and the annexation of Sindh in 1843 from two perspective. The first is the colonial historiographic project that frames the history of Islam in India, creates an archive for its study, and produces the political and military dominance of Sindh. Fundamentally, it argues that Muslims in India cannot produce their own histories for they lack the language and archives for scientific objectivity. In response, a set of Indian intellectuals take on the project of writing histories of Sindh from the 1890s to 1950s. These histories are written in direct dialogue with the colonial archive and insist on their engagement with social scientific methodologies and tools. In re‐thinking this past, the essay argues that vernacular historiography was itself deemed un‐scientific by modern South Asian historians and abandoned as not “proper history.” This essay thus reflects on the after‐effects of a truncated conversation on history for both anti‐colonial thought and histories of anti‐colonialism.