Quantum non-Abelian hydrodynamics: Anyonic or spin–orbital entangled liquids, nonunitarity of scattering matrix and charge fractionalization

Abstract

In this article, we develop an exact (nonadiabatic, nonperturbative) density matrix scattering theory for a two component quantum liquid which interacts or scatters off from a generic spin-dependent quantum potential. The generic spin dependent quantum potential [Eq. (1)] is a matrix potential, hence, adiabaticity criterion is ill-defined. Therefore the full matrix potential should be treated nonadiabatically. We succeed in doing so using the notion of vectorial matrices which allows us to obtain an exact analytical expression for the scattered density matrix (SDM), ϱsc[Eq. (30)]. We find that the number or charge density in scattered fluid, Tr (ϱsc), expressions in Eqs. (32) depends on nontrivial quantum interference coefficients, [Formula: see text], which arises due to quantum interference between spin-independent and spin-dependent scattering amplitudes and among spin-dependent scattering amplitudes. Further it is shown that Tr (ϱsc) can be expressed in a compact form [Eq. (39)] where the effect of quantum interference coefficients can be included using a vector Qαβ, which allows us to define a vector order parameterQ. Since the number density is obtained using an exact scattered density matrix, therefore, we do not need to prove that Q is non-zero. However, for sake of completeness, we make detailed mathematical analysis for the conditions under which the vector order parameterQ would be zero or nonzero.We find that in presence of spin-dependent interaction the vector order parameterQ is necessarily nonzero and is related to the commutator and anti-commutator of scattering matrix S with its dagger S†[Eq. (78)]. It is further shown that Q≠0, implies four physically equivalent conditions,i.e., spin-orbital entanglement is nonzero, non-Abelian scattering phase, i.e., matrices, scattering matrix is nonunitary and the broken time reversal symmetry for SDM. This also implies that quasi particle excitation are anyonic in nature, hence, charge fractionalization is a natural consequence. This aspect has also been discussed from the perspective of number or charge density conservation, which implies i.e., Tr (ϱ}sc) = Tr (ϱin). On the other hand Q = 0 turns out to be a mathematically forced unphysical solution in presence of spin-dependent potential or scattering which is equivalent to Abelian hydrodynamics, unitary scattering matrix, absence of spin-space entanglement and preserved time reversal symmetry. We have formulated the theory using mesoscopic language, specifically, we have considered two terminal systems connected to spin-dependent scattering region, which is equivalent to having two potential wells separated by a generic spin-dependent potential barrier. The formulation using mesoscopic language is practically useful because it leads directly to the measured quantities such as conductance and spin-polarization density in the leads, however, the presented formulation is not limited to the mesoscopic system only, its generality has been stressed at various places in this article.