Abstract

Quantum plasmas are an important topic in astrophysics and high pressure laboratory physics for more than 50 years. In addition, many condensed matter systems, including the electron gas in metals, metallic nanoparticles, or electron-hole systems in semiconductors and heterostructures, exhibit—to some extent—plasmalike behavior. Among the key theoretical approaches that have been applied to these systems are quantum kinetic theory, Green function theory, quantum Monte Carlo, semiclassical and quantum molecular dynamics, and more recently, density functional theory simulations. These activities are in close contact with the experiments and have firmly established themselves in the fields of plasma physics, astrophysics, and condensed matter physics. About two decades ago, a second branch of quantum plasma theory emerged that is based on a quantum fluid description and has attracted a substantial number of researchers. The focus of these studies has been on collective oscillations and linear and nonlinear waves in quantum plasmas. Even though these papers pretend to address the same physical systems as the more traditional papers mentioned above, the former appear to form a rather closed community that is largely isolated from the rest of the field. The quantum hydrodynamics (QHD) results have—with a few exceptions—not found application in astrophysics or in experiments in condensed matter physics. Moreover, these results practically did not have any impact on the former quantum plasma theory community. One reason is the unknown accuracy of the QHD for dense plasmas. In this paper, we present a novel derivation, starting from reduced density operators that clearly point to the deficiencies of QHD, and we outline possible improvements. It is also to be noted that some of the QHD results have attracted negative attention being criticized as unphysical. Examples include the prediction of “novel attractive forces” between protons in an equilibrium quantum plasma, the notion of “spinning quantum plasmas,” or the new field of “quantum dusty plasmas.” In the present article, we discuss the latter system in some detail because it is a particularly disturbing case of formal theoretical investigations that are detached from physical reality despite bold and unproven claims of importance for, e.g., dense astrophysical plasmas or microelectronics. We stress that these deficiencies are not a problem of QHD itself, which is a powerful and efficient method, but rather are due to ignorance of its properties and limitations. We analyze the common flaws of these works and come up with suggestions to improve the situation of QHD applications to quantum plasmas.

Highlights

  • Quantum plasmas—charged particle systems in which at least one component exhibit quantum degeneracy—are ubiquitous in nature, e.g., Refs. 1–4

  • Examples include the prediction of “novel attractive forces” between protons in an equilibrium quantum plasma, the notion of “spinning quantum plasmas,” or the new field of “quantum dusty plasmas.”. We discuss the latter system in some detail because it is a disturbing case of formal theoretical investigations that are detached from physical reality despite bold and unproven claims of importance for, e.g., dense astrophysical plasmas or microelectronics

  • Quantum hydrodynamics has been reviewed in many text books and articles, e.g., Refs. 74, 80, 83, 96, and 97; we here concentrate on aspects that are of relevance for quantum plasma applications

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Quantum plasmas—charged particle systems in which at least one component (typically the electrons) exhibit quantum degeneracy—are ubiquitous in nature, e.g., Refs. 1–4. Many papers that applied QHD models to quantum plasmas neither include a careful validity analysis nor comparisons to experiments or more accurate theories It does not come as a surprise that numerous predictions have been made that are either highly speculative or even in conflict with results that are well established in other fields. One may wonder how the claims about relevance of the results for compact stars, on the one hand, and for solid state systems, on the other, are being justified in the QHD-quantum plasma papers This is a crucial question for this field in general that goes far beyond the particular case of quantum dusty plasmas. VI and VII with an outlook for quantum plasma theory where we summarize the main challenges the field is facing, in general, and the scientific contributions, QHD is capable of making, in particular

QUANTUM PLASMA PARAMETERS
QUANTUM HYDRODYNAMICS
Bohmian quantum mechanics
Quantum hydrodynamics for Bose-Einstein condensates
Ground state results
Quantum hydrodynamics for dense plasmas
Averaging over the orbitals
Discussion of the QHD equations and possible improvements
TRANSFER OF PLASMA PHYSICS RESULTS FROM ONE SYSTEM TO ANOTHER
Plasmas in solid state systems
Dusty plasmas
QUANTUM DUSTY PLASMAS
Basic parameters of QDP
Predicted occurrences of QDP
Impossibility of dust grain existence in a quantum plasma
Test of quantum dusty plasma parameters used in the literature
QUO VADIS QHD FOR QUANTUM PLASMAS?
Scientific standards have to be enforced again
Requirements to QHD-based quantum plasma theory papers
Toward an improved QHD for fermions
Current topics in quantum plasma theory
CONCLUSIONS

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.