Abstract

RNA-Seq is increasingly used for the diagnosis of patients, targeting of therapies and for single cell transcriptomics. These applications require cost effective, fast and reliable ways of capturing and analyzing gene expression data. Here we compared Lexogen’s QuantSeq which captures only the 3′ end of RNA transcripts and Illumina’s TruSeq, using both Tophat2 and Salmon for gene quantification. We also compared these results to microarray. This analysis was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated with Poly (I:C), a viral mimic that induces innate antiviral responses. This provides a well-established model to determine if RNA-Seq and QuantSeq identify the same biological signatures. Gene expression levels in QuantSeq and RNA-Seq were strongly correlated (Spearman’s rho ~0.8), Salmon and Tophat2 (Spearman’s rho > 0.9). There was high consistency in protein coding genes, non-concordant genes had a high proportion of shorter, non-coding features. RNA-Seq identified more differentially expressed genes than QuantSeq, both methods outperformed microarray. The same key biological signals emerged in each of these approaches. We conclude that QuantSeq, coupled with a fast quantification method such as Salmon, should provide a viable alternative to traditional RNA-Seq in many applications and may be of particular value in the study of the 3′UTR region of mRNA.

Highlights

  • RNA-Seq is increasingly used for the diagnosis of patients, targeting of therapies and for single cell transcriptomics

  • Our experimental design consisted of six biological replicates of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), three of which were treated with Poly(I:C) as described further in Methods

  • Our next-generation sequencing workflow produced four result sets (i) RNA-Seq mapped with Tophat, (ii) QuantSeq mapped with Tophat (iii) RNA-Seq quantified with Salmon (iv) QuantSeq quantified with Salmon

Read more

Summary

Introduction

RNA-Seq is increasingly used for the diagnosis of patients, targeting of therapies and for single cell transcriptomics These applications require cost effective, fast and reliable ways of capturing and analyzing gene expression data. We compared Lexogen’s QuantSeq which captures only the 3′ end of RNA transcripts and Illumina’s TruSeq, using both Tophat[2] and Salmon for gene quantification The motivation for using QuantSeq and Salmon is similar, with both potentially providing a straightforward means of gene expression analysis This may be of particular benefit in emerging clinical applications as well as for single cell RNA-Seq which by its very nature involves transcript quantification of a very large number of samples, at lower number of reads per sample

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call