Abstract
Hospital volume and often also operator volume have documented impacts on the quality of care for aortic and aortocoronary bypass surgery, for percutaneous angioplasty and for radiofrequency ablation for arrhythmias, whereas data are less consistent for treatment of acute myocardial infarction. A review of this research is given. In the Nordic countries hospitals are small, and often the plateau of the learning curve cannot be reached. To discourage low-volume centers from embarking upon too complicated interventional or surgical procedures, the author suggests that a minimal number should be set for certain major procedures, both for hospitals and for physicians.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.