Abstract

All materials and structures interact with their environment through surfaces, and consequently the importance of surface as opposed to bulk analysis is increasingly recognized in the design and development of advanced materials. Electron spectroscopic methods such as Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) have the capability for microanalysis of the top few atom layers of solid samples. Traditionally, AES uses electron beam excitation, with correspondingly high spatial resolution, but was thought to give only limited chemical state information, whereas XPS was used for surface chemical analysis at an early stage of its development but with poor spatial resolution. Recent developments in both theory and instrumentation tend to blur this distinction, with chemical information available from AES together with a trend in XPS toward microarea analysis and, lately, imaging. In this article, the two techniques are compared and contrasted, with an emphasis on their microanalytical capability and potential for full quantification. Examples are taken from various areas of metallurgy and materials science.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.