Abstract

For tight sandstone reservoirs, the pore structure is sensitive to the stress variations during the production process. The alternation of pore structure influences the petrophysical properties and therefore the dynamic flow of tight sandstone reservoirs. In this research, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) technique is employed to quantitatively study the pore volume variation under different confining pressures. Not only during the compression process, this research also investigated the sandstone pore sensitivity to stress during the recovery process of rock samples, which is equally important and happens during the production process when the formation pressure is building up due to the temporary well shut-in or water injection. The core samples selected from Ordos basin are first tested routinely for basic parameters like porosity, permeability and detrital components, and then through both compression and recovery processes where the pressure decreases and increases, respectively. It is found that the core samples with high permeability show stronger stress sensitivity of pores than those with low permeability due to the higher content of large pores. Besides permeability, detrital components and interstitial material can also affect the stress sensitivity of pores. During the recovery process, the low recovery degree of pore volume is related to the recoverable pore size (mainly smaller size pores) and the narrow distribution range of recovered pores. Furthermore, the power function relationship and the exponential relationship are suggested to evaluate the variation of pore volume in compression and recovery process, respectively. The results demonstrated that the compressibility of larger pores is bigger than that of smaller pores. During the compression process, the higher permeability rocks, containing a higher content of larger pores, are easier to be compressed, and has a greater decrease in permeability. Besides, the recoverability of the total pore volume after compression is mainly controlled by smaller pores, which results in the lower recoverability of the total pore volume and the permeability for the higher permeability core samples.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.