Quantitative reliability of aromaticity and related measurements on coals by 13C n.m.r. A debate

Abstract

While solid state 13C n.m.r. has made a major contribution to the characterization of coal and other insoluble carbonaceous materials over the past decade, there has been considerable uncertainty concerning the quantitative reliability of the technique. This debate addresses this important topic and comprises six contributions from authors who are recognized experts in n.m.r. characterization of solid fuels. The principal issue discussed is the accuracy of aromaticity measurements on coals by cross-polarization — magic-angle spinning (CP/MAS) 13C n.m.r., together with additional problems posed by high field measurements and spectral editing, and with some discussion of emerging techniques. There is a consensus that significant errors can arise in CP/MAS 13C n.m.r. measurements of aromaticity due to the unfortunate spin-dynamics of coals, which typically result in only ≈50% of the carbon being observed for bituminous coals. There is clear discrimination against aromatic carbon, but differences of opinion exist over the magnitude of the errors (from 2 to 15 mole carbon %) and whether high field (⩾ 50 MHz) measurements are as accurate as those of low field (< 25 MHz) because either sideband suppression or extremely high speed MAS has to be employed to eliminate sidebands. From the evidence presented, it is suggested that a combination of low field, single pulse excitation with long relaxation delays and the use of a suitable reagent to quench paramagnetic centres is the most satisfactory, albeit time consuming, recipe for obtaining reasonably reliable results on unknown samples. An inter-laboratory exercise is being organized by Argonne National Laboratory to check the precision and to further investigate quantitative reliability of 13C n.m.r. measurements on coals from their Premium Coal Sample Bank.