Abstract

The use of “belly scoring” can offer a novel, non-invasive objective management tool to gauge food intake between individuals, groups, and populations, and thus, population fitness. As food availability is increasingly affected by predation, ecological competition, climate change, habitat modification, and other human activities, an accurate belly scoring tool can facilitate comparisons among wildlife populations, serving as an early warning indicator of threats to wildlife population health and potential population collapse. In social species, belly scores can also be a tool to understand social behavior and ranking. We developed and applied the first rigorous quantitative photogrammetric methodology to measure belly scores of wild painted dogs (Lycaon pictus). Our methodology involves: (1) Rigorous selection of photographs of the dorso/lateral profile of individuals at a right angle to the camera, (2) photogrammetrically measuring belly chord length and “belly drop” in pixels, (3) adjusting belly chord length as a departure from a standardized leg angle, and (4) converting pixel measurements to ratios to eliminate the need to introduce distance from the camera. To highlight a practical application, this belly score method was applied to 631 suitable photographs of 15 painted dog packs that included 186 individuals, all collected between 2004–2015 from allopatric painted dog populations in and around Hwange (n = 462) and Mana Pools National Parks (n = 169) in Zimbabwe. Variation in mean belly scores exhibited a cyclical pattern throughout the year, corresponding to biologically significant patterns to include denning demand and prey availability. Our results show significant differences between belly scores of the two different populations we assessed, thus highlighting food stress in the Hwange population. In the face of growing direct and indirect anthropogenic disturbances, this standardised methodology can provide a rapid, species-specific non-invasive management tool that can be applied across studies to rapidly detect emergent threats.

Highlights

  • IntroductionRegular monitoring of animal populations is critical to facilitate detection of key trends (e.g., demography, survival, and well-being) both within and between populations [1, 2]

  • Regular monitoring of animal populations is critical to facilitate detection of key trends both within and between populations [1, 2]

  • We found a significant difference in mean belly scores between the Hwange and Mana Pools populations (F1, 118.0 = 10.721, p = 0.001), as well as significant variation in mean belly scores among months for both populations (F1,139.4 = 8.596, p = 0.004)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Regular monitoring of animal populations is critical to facilitate detection of key trends (e.g., demography, survival, and well-being) both within and between populations [1, 2]. This can be done through traditional wildlife monitoring methods such as censuses, but these options are expensive, time consuming, and/or labour intensive [3, 4]. We propose using a combination of photogrammetry and body indices to quantitatively assess belly scores (a body index) to monitor individuals and populations, and to facilitate rapid detection of fluctuating parameters that could affect survival

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.