Abstract
Differential phase contrast (DPC) is a non-interferometric quantitative phase imaging method achieved by using an asymmetric imaging procedure. We report a pupil modulation differential phase contrast (PMDPC) imaging method by filtering a sample's Fourier domain with half-circle pupils. A phase gradient image is captured with each half-circle pupil, and a quantitative high resolution phase image is obtained after a deconvolution process with a minimum of two phase gradient images. Here, we introduce PMDPC quantitative phase image reconstruction algorithm and realize it experimentally in a 4f system with an SLM placed at the pupil plane. In our current experimental setup with the numerical aperture of 0.36, we obtain a quantitative phase image with a resolution of 1.73μm after computationally removing system aberrations and refocusing. We also extend the depth of field digitally by 20 times to ±50μm with a resolution of 1.76μm.
Highlights
While traditional microscopy only captures the intensity, an object’s phase information is highly desired in many situations
Quantitative phase imaging with microbeads A quantitative phase images of a 10μm polystyrene microbead sample is imaged to show pupil modulation differential phase contrast (PMDPC)’s quantitative phase reconstruction capability. 10μm microbeads are immersed in oil (n = 1.580) at room temperature
Quantitative high resolution phase images can be reconstructed with a minimum of one pair of phase gradient images captured with complimentary half-circle pupils
Summary
While traditional microscopy only captures the intensity, an object’s phase information is highly desired in many situations. Used phase gradient methods such as Zernike phase contrast microscope [1] and Nomarski’s differential interference contrast (DIC) [2] are able to get qualitative phase contrast images. In both techniques, phase and intensity information are mixed in the images and the phase measurement is not quantitative. Holography [3,4,5,6,7] is another phase imaging method where the object’s wavefront interferes with a reference beam and the phase information is obtained from the recorded interference pattern. Limited spatial coherence negatively influences the absolute phase value accuracy
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have