Abstract

Plants have to cope with a plethora of biotic stresses such as herbivory and pathogen attacks throughout their life cycle. The biotic stresses typically trigger rapid emissions of volatile products of lipoxygenase (LOX) pathway (LOX products: various C6 aldehydes, alcohols, and derivatives, also called green leaf volatiles) associated with oxidative burst. Further a variety of defense pathways is activated, leading to induction of synthesis and emission of a complex blend of volatiles, often including methyl salicylate, indole, mono-, homo-, and sesquiterpenes. The airborne volatiles are involved in systemic responses leading to elicitation of emissions from non-damaged plant parts. For several abiotic stresses, it has been demonstrated that volatile emissions are quantitatively related to the stress dose. The biotic impacts under natural conditions vary in severity from mild to severe, but it is unclear whether volatile emissions also scale with the severity of biotic stresses in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, biotic impacts are typically recurrent, but it is poorly understood how direct stress-triggered and systemic emission responses are silenced during periods intervening sequential stress events. Here we review the information on induced emissions elicited in response to biotic attacks, and argue that biotic stress severity vs. emission rate relationships should follow principally the same dose–response relationships as previously demonstrated for different abiotic stresses. Analysis of several case studies investigating the elicitation of emissions in response to chewing herbivores, aphids, rust fungi, powdery mildew, and Botrytis, suggests that induced emissions do respond to stress severity in dose-dependent manner. Bi-phasic emission kinetics of several induced volatiles have been demonstrated in these experiments, suggesting that next to immediate stress-triggered emissions, biotic stress elicited emissions typically have a secondary induction response, possibly reflecting a systemic response. The dose–response relationships can also vary in dependence on plant genotype, herbivore feeding behavior, and plant pre-stress physiological status. Overall, the evidence suggests that there are quantitative relationships between the biotic stress severity and induced volatile emissions. These relationships constitute an encouraging platform to develop quantitative plant stress response models.

Highlights

  • Plants as sedentary organisms cannot escape from attackers and stressors and have to adjust to surrounding environment and biotic attacks through their life cycle

  • Numerous VOCs have been described, which belong to a few broad compound classes, including volatile isoprenoids, volatile products of shikimic acid pathway, carbohydrate and fatty acid cleavage products (Figure 1 for some examples of characteristic volatiles released from plants and Figure 2 for their biosynthetic pathways (Knudsen et al, 1993; Dudareva et al, 2006; Qualley and Dudareva, 2008; Dicke and Baldwin, 2010; Fineschi et al, 2013)

  • As in the nature plants are under continuous pressure of biotic stresses of differing severity, we argue that the overall lack of quantitative stress dose vs. plant response studies is an important shortcoming

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Plants as sedentary organisms cannot escape from attackers and stressors and have to adjust to surrounding environment and biotic attacks through their life cycle. Plants have evolved various defense strategies, including release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from their above-ground organs (Zhang et al, 1999; Zhang and Schlyter, 2004; Huang et al, 2012; Fineschi et al, 2013) into the ambient atmosphere, and even from roots into the soil air space and water (Hiltpold et al, 2011; Turlings et al, 2012). Numerous VOCs have been described, which belong to a few broad compound classes, including volatile isoprenoids, volatile products of shikimic acid pathway (phenylpropanoids, benzenoids, indole), carbohydrate and fatty acid cleavage products (Figure 1 for some examples of characteristic volatiles released from plants and Figure 2 for their biosynthetic pathways (Knudsen et al, 1993; Dudareva et al, 2006; Qualley and Dudareva, 2008; Dicke and Baldwin, 2010; Fineschi et al, 2013). Due to significant differences in physico-chemical characteristics of VOCs within and among the different compound classes (Niinemets et al, 2004), the release kinetics, compound life-time in the ambient atmosphere and uptake by neighboring vegetation strongly vary (Baldwin et al, 2006; Arneth and Niinemets, 2010; Holopainen et al, 2013)

Quantifying biological interactions
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call