Abstract

Although the factors involved in cirrhotic ascites have been studied for a century, a number of observations are not understood, including the action of diuretics in the treatment of ascites and the ability of the plasma-ascitic albumin gradient to diagnose portal hypertension. This communication presents an explanation of ascites based solely on pathophysiological alterations within the peritoneal cavity. A quantitative model is described based on experimental vascular and intraperitoneal pressures, lymph flow, and peritoneal space compliance. The model's predictions accurately mimic clinical observations in ascites, including the magnitude and time course of changes observed following paracentesis or diuretic therapy.

Highlights

  • Ascites commonly is regarded as a clinical condition that can be understood in terms of classic physiological principals

  • Summary As discussed in the Introduction, in recent years ascites research largely has focused on the systemic changes observed in cirrhosis with particular emphasis on the “hyperdynamic circulation” syndrome

  • We theorize that ascites formation is dependent on just three factors: 1) the rate of protein leak from the liver, which is a function of the difference between the liver tissue pressure and the peritoneal pressure (PL PA); 2) the colloid osmotic fluid movement between the intestinal tissue and the peritoneal space; and 3) the rate of lymph drainage of the peritoneal space, which is a function of the peritoneal pressure (PA) and the central venous pressure (PRA)

Read more

Summary

Background

Ascites commonly is regarded as a clinical condition that can be understood in terms of classic physiological principals. In an attempt to better understand the physiology of ascites, we present what appears to be the first quantitative model of the formation and removal of ascitic fluid In this model, ascites accumulation is explained solely by pathophysiological alterations within the peritoneal cavity; systemic abnormalities are considered relevant only to the extent that they alter intraperitoneal physiology. This discussion includes mechanistic explanations for several clinically important, but poorly understood phenomena. This model accurately predicts the magnitude and time course of the changes in ascites volume that are observed clinically with diuretic treatment or paracentesis. The attached Additional file 1 (Section A), provides a more detailed discussion of the evidence supporting (or contradicting) the model’s assumptions

Discussion
Quantitative physical modeling
Starling EH
34. Dudley FJ
36. Guyton AC
80. Krook H
Findings
84. Rector WG Jr
89. Krediet RT
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.