Abstract
In the past decade, debates over the definition of populism have coalesced into a minimal working definition. Qualitative studies seeking to define parties as dichotomously populist or not have minimal use in a comparative context. While studies were able to examine the conditions under which “populist” parties were successful, what defined “populist” was left to country and topic experts. Operationalizing these definitions of populism allows for empirical measurement, quantitative scaling, and ultimately cross-national and diachronic comparisons. Scales have been developed to measure how much populism is present in a party, among their representatives, in the public, and captured in political discourse. Such objective measures allow for confirmation or refutation of the presence of populism and the shedding of normative biases associated with this analytical term. This research note captures the current breadth of research using quantitative measures.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.