Abstract

The spatial variability of soil properties has always been a significant research field in geoscience. The types of soil properties cover a wide range, but most studies have focused on the spatial variability of soil physicochemical properties over the past decades. Studies on soil hydraulic characteristics are limited, and most of them are limited to the farmland scale. However, the spatial variability of regional soil properties (soil texture and hydraulic properties) is valuable for the study of sedimentation processes and soil water transport. Therefore, here, the spatial variation of six soil properties (sand, silt, clay content, bulk density, saturated water content and saturated hydraulic conductivity) in the typical alluvial plain area of the lower Yellow River is quantitatively studied, by using classical statistics, geostatistics and single fractal and multifractal methods. This study mainly quantitatively analysed the spatial variability of different soil properties and compared four research methods. Although the coefficient of variation, nugget coefficient, single fractal dimension and multifractal spectral width can reflect spatial variability, diverse conclusions are drawn (on variability) if different methods are used, and the different soil properties show large disparities. These four methods show a different variation order of soil properties, but there are some common conclusions based on analysis and judgment. In general, the silt content in the study area is stable, mainly originating from loess transported by Yellow River erosion, which is also reflected in the Kriging interpolation maps under the geostatistical models. The variation in bulk density and saturated water content is weak, and the spatial variability of sand and clay content is moderate. In addition, the saturated hydraulic conductivity fluctuates violently. This may be related to the differences in local topography, human activity and the content of sand and clay, each of which significantly affects the saturated hydraulic conductivity. Classical statistics has a limitation because it fails to corelate with spatial location. Due to the small sample capacity and calculation error of lag distance, the accuracy of geostatistics and single fractal dimensions needs to be improved. Multifractal spectral analysis does not need to consider the normality of data and can quantitatively represent local characteristics; therefore, its results have high reliability.

Highlights

  • The characteristics of soil particle distribution and hydraulic propertiesare the basis for the study of soil moisture and solute transport [1]

  • The combination of fractals and geostatistics can realise the quantitative characterisation of soil property spatial variation [3]; that is, the fractal dimension increases with the distribution uniformity

  • Classical statistics cannot establish the relationship between variables and spatial location; geostatistics and the fractal dimension are used for further analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The characteristics of soil particle distribution and hydraulic properties (hereafter “soil properties”)are the basis for the study of soil moisture and solute transport [1]. The determination of distribution characteristics of the soil properties at a certain scale is significant for reasonable sampling and parameter prediction. Classical statistics and geostatistics were the main methods used to study spatial variation. Geostatistics establishes the relationship between lag distance and variables through the semivariance function, which is the main means of quantitative analysis of spatial variability and the basis of Kriging interpolation. The combination of fractals and geostatistics can realise the quantitative characterisation of soil property spatial variation [3]; that is, the fractal dimension increases with the distribution uniformity. Researchers all over the world have calculated the fractal dimension values of various soil properties and environmental variables of different soil types. Due to different soil types, research scales and sample capacity, the fractal dimension values are varied, but they are all in the range of

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call