Abstract
IntroductionPatients with epilepsy have a disturbed sleep architecture. Polysomnographic studies have shown that patients with refractory epilepsy have decreased rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and longer REM latency than those with medically controlled epilepsy. However, little is known about the differences in the REM sleep microstructure between these patient groups. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective case–control study of 20 patients with refractory epilepsy (refractory group) and 28 patients with medically controlled epilepsy (medically controlled group). All patients completed sleep questionnaires and underwent overnight in-lab polysomnography. Five-minute electroencephalogram recordings at the C3 and C4 electrodes from each REM sleep were selected for spectral analysis, and 5-min electrocardiogram segments recorded during REM sleep were used for heart rate variability analysis. The groups’ scores on the sleep questionnaires, polysomnographic sleep parameters, indices of sleep-related breathing disorders, and REM sleep electroencephalogram spectra were compared. ResultsThe refractory group had decreased REM sleep (p < 0.001) and longer REM latency (p = 0.0357) than those of the medically controlled group. Moreover, electroencephalogram spectral analysis revealed that the refractory group had decreased absolute beta power (p = 0.0039) and relative beta power (p = 0.0035) as well as increased relative delta power (p = 0.0015) compared with the medically controlled group. ConclusionsDifferences in the polysomnographic macrostructure and REM sleep microstructure between the study groups suggest REM sleep dysregulation in patients with refractory epilepsy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.