Abstract

Proprioception is related to neural input to the brain regarding the position, speed and direction of the movement, vibration and pressure in a particular joint. It protects against excessive forces and injury. The PURPOSE of this study was to evaluate active and passive proprioception in 5 surfers, 4 injured athletes and 5 controls. The HYPOTHESIS was that the injured subjects have lower proprioceptive indices than the surfers. An isokinetic device (Biodex 3) was used with the knee at 20° of flexion. Testing was done following Guido's protocol. The perception of the joint position was recorded with active and passive actions. The subjects were blinded and performed 3 trials for each repositioning. The score was the difference between the repositioned angle and the starting angle of 20° degrees. The mean ± sd were calculated. RESULTS:Tablea) p = 0.003, surfers: active vs passive; b) p = 0.001 surfers vs injured; c) p = 0.001 surfers vs controls; CONCLUSION: The surfers showed better scores (p = 0.001) than the injured and the controls groups. The active re-positioning occurred with less error than the passive repositioning, and this might mean that the muscle contraction of the active mode was a stronger stimuli for the proprioceptors than the stretching of the same receptors during the passive mode, resulting in better proprioceptive feedback.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.