Abstract
Purpose To quantitatively evaluate cone-beam CT (CBCT) in target volume definition in an offline image guidance environment. Methods and materials Fifteen patients each with five helical CTs (HCT) and eight CBCTs were included. A single physician manually delineated prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) on each CT. The clinical target volume (CTV) was prostate for low risk group (G1), plus SVs for intermediate risk group (G2). The internal target volumes (ITVs) on CBCT (ITV CBCT) were constructed and compared with ITV HCT. The following comparisons were performed: CTV and ITV in HCT and CBCT; similarity of ITVs using overlap index (OI); surface differences between ITVs; quality assurance of ITV CBCT using CTV from weekly CBCT; and dosimetric evaluations of ITV HCT coverage on plans from ITV CBCT. Results There was no statistical significant difference of CTV or ITV. The ITV OIs were 91%/88% for G1/G2 patients. They improved significantly with 1–2 mm margins. Therefore, the ITVs were mostly within 2 mm. The CTVs from weekly CBCT had >95% overlap with ITV CBCT. The ITV dose differences ( D 95, and D mean) were <0.3%. Conclusions It is feasible to use CBCT for target definition in offline image guidance, thereby eliminating the separate helical CT scan process.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.