Quantitative coronary computed tomography assessment for differentiating between total occlusions and severe stenoses

Abstract

BackgroundsThe impact of quantitative assessment to differentiate total occlusions (TOs) from severe stenoses on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) remains unknown. ObjectiveThis study investigated whether quantitative characteristics assessed on CCTA could help differentiate a TO from a severe stenosis on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). MethodsThis study is a sub-analysis of the FASTTRACK CABG (NCT04142021) in which both CCTA and ICA were routinely performed. Quantitative analysis was performed with semi-automated CCTA plaque-analysis software. Blinded analysts compared TOs on CCTA, defined as a complete lack of contrast opacification within the coronary occlusion, with corresponding ICA. ResultsEighty-four TOs were seen on CCTA in 59 of the 114 patients enrolled in the trial. The concordance in diagnosing a TO between ICA and CCTA was 56.0% (n ​= ​47). Compared to severe stenoses, TOs had a significantly longer lesion length (25.1 ​± ​23.0 ​mm vs 9.4 ​± ​11.2 ​mm, P ​< ​0.001). The best cut-off value to differentiate a TO from severe stenosis was a lesion length of 5.5 ​mm (area under the curve 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66–0.87), with a 91.1% sensitivity and 61.1% specificity. Dense calcium percentage atheroma volume (PAV) was significantly higher in TOs compared to severe stenoses (18.7 ​± ​19.6% vs. 6.6 ​± ​13.0%, P ​< ​0.001), whilst the opposite was seen for fibro-fatty PAV (31.3 ​± ​14.2% vs. 19.5 ​± ​10.5%, P ​< ​0.001). On a multivariable logistic regression analysis, lesion length (>5.5 ​mm) was the only parameter associated with differentiating a TO from a severe stenosis. ConclusionIn quantitative CCTA analysis, a lesion length >5.5 ​mm was the only independent predictor differentiating a TO from a severe stenosis. NCT registration numberNCT04142021.