Abstract

This study describes a comparison of smoked foils from five different mixtures $$({\hbox {C}}_{2}{\hbox {H}}_{2}+2.5{\hbox {O}}_{2}+85\,\%{\hbox {Ar}}, 2{\hbox {H}}_{2}+{\hbox {O}}_{2}+50\,\%{\hbox {Ar}}, {\hbox {C}}_{2}{\hbox {H}}_{2}+2.5{\hbox {O}}_{2}+70\,\%{\hbox {Ar}}, \hbox {C}_{2}{\hbox {H}}_{2}+5{\hbox {N}}_{2}{\hbox {O}}$$ , and $${\hbox {CH}}_{4}+2{\hbox {O}}_{2})$$ that produced transverse waves of regular and irregular spacing. Histograms, variance, and the autocorrelation function (ACF) were used to quantify the spacing irregularity. Each smoked foil was first digitized then separated into left-running and right-running waves for subsequent analysis. The five mixtures showed different degrees of irregularity in the analysis of the histograms and the ACF of the spacing of the transverse waves. The dominant mode was readily found from the peak in the histogram and the first peak in the ACF result. The spacing of the main transverse waves provided by the histogram and the first peak of the ACF were much closer to the spacing of the transverse waves measured by eye for stable mixtures than for unstable ones due to their stronger dominant mode. In certain cases, other modes besides the dominant one were observed, such as two peaks in the histogram and other large peaks in the ACF result. Variance was used as a quantitative measurement of the cellular pattern irregularity level.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.