Abstract

AimTo clarify whether quantitative assessment of pupillary light reflexes (PLR) can predict the outcome of post-cardiac arrest (CA) patients during the first 72 h after the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). MethodsFifty adults resuscitated after non-traumatic out-of-hospital CA (OHCA) (mean age 64.1 years old, 36 males) were enrolled in four emergency hospitals. PLR was sequentially measured at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after ROSC by an automated portable infrared pupillometry. PLR values for each time point were compared between both survivors and non-survivors, and patients with either favourable (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 or 2) or unfavourable neurological outcomes. ResultsTwenty-three patients survived for 90 days after CA, and 13 patients achieved favourable neurological outcomes. The PLR values of the survivors and patients with favourable neurological outcomes were consistently greater than those of non-survivors (P < 0.001) and those with unfavourable neurological outcomes (P < 0.001), respectively. The change in PLR over time was not statistically different between the outcome groups. The 0-hour PLR best predicted both 90-day survival (AUC = 0.82, cutoff 3%, sensitivity 0.87, specificity 0.80) and favourable neurological outcomes (AUC = 0.84, cutoff 6%, sensitivity 0.92, specificity 0.74). No patient with a 6-hour PLR less than 3% survived for 90 days after CA. ConclusionsQuantitatively measured PLR was consistently greater in survivors and patients with favourable neurological outcomes during the 72 h after ROSC. Quantitative assessment of PLR at as early as 0 h has a potential role for prognostication in post-CA patients.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.