Abstract

In the last years, renewable energy sources have been changing the power system by making it more challenging to balance the generation and demand at every single point in time. The increasing penetration of distributed generation represents another trend at the distribution level that impacts the exploitation of existing distribution assets. In this context, the flexibility of distributed energy resources connected to the distribution systems may play an important role. The flexibility products are represented by variations in the scheduled/expected active and reactive power setpoints. Recently, regulatory bodies suggested many proposals and undertook actions for enabling new players, such as the distributed energy resources connected to the distribution systems, to provide both system and local services. However, currently, there are still barriers that might limit their effective involvement. Market schemes have been proposed for opening the participation of distributed energy resources in the service markets. This paper proposes an analytical quantification of how much the use of flexibility by the transmission system operator can influence the distribution system operator activities and the expected costs. The final goal is quantifying the flexibility that the transmission system operator can procure from the distribution system without a harmful impact on the distribution network operation. The paper investigates the expected interactions between the use of flexibility for power system balancing and security and the operation of distribution systems. The application of the methodology to a significant Case Study showed that even though the fit and forget approach causes a hypertrophic development of distribution systems to host distributed generation, the transmission system operator cannot obtain the required flexibility services or has to pay extra costs for bottlenecks caused by distribution system operational issues.

Highlights

  • Transmission system operator (TSO) and distribution system operator (DSO) interactions become essential for avoiding unnecessary bottlenecks in opening market participation and will be strengthened due to the expected energy transition

  • The final goal is quantifying the flexibility that the TSO can procure from the distribution system without a harmful impact on the distribution network operation

  • This fact is due to the increased number of operating points on which it is subdivided by the larger range of the market potential due to the added flexibility offered by the end-users

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Transmission system operator (TSO) and distribution system operator (DSO) interactions become essential for avoiding unnecessary bottlenecks in opening market participation and will be strengthened due to the expected energy transition. DERs, as RES-based generators, fuel generators (e.g., combined heat and power, CHP), energy storage systems, as well as active users, can offer flexible products to the TSO to ensure reliable system operation and to the DSOs, to better operate their networks Purposes related to such flexibility may be avoiding massive infrastructural investments for network reinforcement, not jeopardising the achieved high levels of system stability and security of supply, system balancing, voltage regulation and power congestion relieving, etc. The synthetic networks built with the developed procedure are used to calculate possible outbound conditions (e.g., excessive voltage variations, critical power flows, etc.), and, to propose the optimal operation of networks to fix any issue that can arise when flexibility products are offered to the TSO by the DERs. The paper investigates the expected interactions between the use of flexibility for power system balancing and security and the operation of distribution systems.

Flexibility Services
Regulatory Framework
Proposed Approach
Modelling the Distribution Systems
Flexibility Providers
Case Study
Results
Analysing the differences between reprethe proposed
Potential
To sum the different
Discussion and Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.